Unfortunately there is no easy investor curriculum to follow.* Virtually unlimited resources provide great advice, useful ideas and concrete strategies – this is dwarfed by the amount of noise, useless and very expensive information (not necessarily because it costs a lot, but because it leads to losses) out there. I find it quite problematic that, in the field of investing, there are different schools of thought that are often claiming to be exclusively right and condemning other approaches as bound to fail. A lot of easily accessible material and news does not have the purpose or incentive to make you a more successful investor. All that is not very useful for an individual investor.
I try to keep an open mind about all possibilities to achieve high, sustainable capital growth, while accounting for the risks taken. Labels like investor or trader, technical or fundamental analysis, academic or practitioner are counterproductive because they narrow your vision and mind unnecessarily. One of the greatest advantages an individual investor has is to be flexible and unconstrained, not blinded by ideology.
There are plenty of examples for historically profitable strategies in each realm. For example value and momentum investing (a fundamental and a technical approach) are really two sides of the same process: a medium term overreaction in the market is followed by a long term reversion towards fundamental value.
To exclude an area on the grounds of philosophy not profitability is – in my mind – not a smart thing to do, yet it is very common practice. Few resources bring together different areas of investing and trading productively – doing that can cancel out disadvantages and enhance advantages of different approaches.
How to separate the wheat from the chaff?
I use my own criteria that all investing or trading ideas have to pass before being included in my investment plan – these criteria don´t judge where an idea is coming from.
Start the process from the top down, by researching ways to build a solid basic portfolio allocation with a realistic positive expectation – a classic buy and hold portfolio of different financial assets. Look at asset allocation models and start from there.**
The more common approach is to start from the bottom up, learning how to analyze and pick individual stocks. This is more likely to lead to a rag-tag collection too concentrated in equities and in areas that are the flavor of the month or part of a personal interest than to a well constructed portfolio. Loss aversion often leads to a group of losers populating the bottom of the portfolio that are deep in the red and play no constructive role at all. This has always lead to a clouded vision and been a great distraction from reaching an intelligent, profitable allocation for me.
Even more enticing is to start with unrealistic return goals, using the latest (day) trading strategy, but most of the time that proves to be a very costly way of going about it, rather than a quick and easy road to financial independence.
Moving from a broad overview of investment knowledge to researching more specific strategies within that framework, avoids a lot of the confusion that hyped strategies or detailed security selection tends to bring.
Stopping at a well diversified buy and hold portfolio would be not a bad thing at all, but limiting portfolio construction to classic allocation concepts leaves possible returns and return diversifiers on the sideline. Many people disagree with this, so it is important to make up your own mind. It is only possible to be successful when you trust your own approach, otherwise it will go out the window at the first sign of trouble.
*Lists of the classic investment books are easily found, I usually read what most interests me at the moment and that has served me well.
**A good place to start and a quick read is the book „Global Asset Allocation“ by Meb Faber.