Site icon systematic individual investor

Mistake Parade I

Large drawdowns are the most difficult time for an investor and trader. They are painful, but unavoidable when investing with the goal of high risk-adjusted returns. Return is based on taking risks and sometimes these risks are bound to materialize as strings of losses. This will happen regularly in a realm where each outcome is largely random, even if probabilities are in fact skewed in our favor.
When leverage is used to boost risk and return beyond market results, it will cause accelerated drawdowns.


If you experience additional losses, that are caused by mistakes, it gets even worse psychologically as well as from the perspective of available equity: losses take disproportionally larger gains to make up for them the larger your drawdown gets.
To keep the gap between theory and practical implementation as small as possible is essential, if we want to reach our goals – it is a continuous battle against our behavioral biases to avoid as many mistakes as possible.


I want to use the opportunity to periodically record the string of events and mistakes leading to a drawdown, as well as the lessons learned, whenever it exceeds 15% to 20% in a short period of time.
It is hard to write about this, when the experience is fresh and the urge is to push the pain away and forget about it. That is also a reason we tend to repeat the mistakes we make much more often than is necessary.
I want to keep a record I can use to recall the mistakes I’m likely to repeat, when I have long forgotten about them – to (hopefully) take the right steps to avoid them in the future. So this post serves as a reminder to myself, but it also describes a very typical investing experience that everyone goes through in some form or other.
We should try hard to draw lessons, that we can actually implement before and during the next drawdown cycle, when positive developments have pushed memories of past mistakes away.

Ray Dalio, founder of the world’s largest hedge fund, highlights the positive impact mistakes can have, when you don’t ignore them and put it into a neat little formula:

Mistakes + Pain + Reflection = Progress


Reasons for a drawdown
The reasons for a drawdown fall into several categories that are important to distinguish, if we want to learn from them:
  1. Good process followed by a bad outcome = random bad luck; we have to expect this to happen – it is par for the course, but, I think, it is possible to use regime indicators to identify market environments that make bad luck more probable. We can then adjust exposure and reduce the overall losses caused by strings of bad luck.
  2. Bad process followed by a bad outcome = mistake; we didn’t follow our rules and avoiding these mistakes is what we should concentrate on most.
  3. Bad process that leads to a good outcome = mistake; this doesn’t cause a drawdown, but should be considered nonetheless – too often it is ignored. The combined number of mistakes will define their drag on return, as random luck will cancel out over time when the mistake sample gets bigger and bigger.


Portfolio analysis
By the end of June 2018 my portfolio had the largest drawdown since I started to record a track record for this blog, in an environment that looked like nothing special at all – at least on the surface. At month’s end it stood at -16,75% – it has since recovered some ground, but easily exceeded -20% intraday at times in June.


What happened?


  1. Changing market environment: this is extremely important to me as market regimes have the greatest influence on return over time and regime changes can be addressed in the investment process. Read the details about changes in market regime and resulting ideas on portfolio management in my next post – I will just list the essential points here:
This made up for more than half the drawdown – in line with the losses of equity markets ex US, but it could have been reduced by cutting leverage more decisively. The remainder was due to my unnecessary mistakes:


  1. Actual mistakes: these always boil down to the same few things. In 2017 I compiled a similar list that was leading to a small, but noticeable drag on return then:
All this culminates in a larger than necessary drawdown every time.


Overall the existence of a written investment plan and diligent record keeping did help to reduce these mistakes considerably (the year-to-date portfolio return at the time of writing in mid-July is positive at 7% – outperforming the average equity markets: US, EAFE and EM), but volatility and drawdown throughout my portfolio was still much larger than necessary.
Avoiding optimistic over-leveraging and having the mental flexibility to scale down exposure quickly according to the strength of warning signals are the most essential take-aways for me – most of the mistakes followed from over-exposure to changes in market volatility. Patiently standing back and watching the correction play out from the sidelines would have been the healthy move leading to a strong outperformance over the market.
Looking beyond raw drawdown numbers this also means that the investment plan is actually good and healthy – concentrating on improving execution could lead to good results for my portfolio in the future.


Take-aways and Solutions


As market regime changes have such a strong impact on portfolio performance, I continue writing about it in the next article.




Exit mobile version